Still fighting the expansion of Riverbend Dumpfill on the banks of the Yamhill River.
Waste Management Inc, the largest garbage company in the whole wide world, has an expansion application in front of the Yamhill County Commissioners. During this application process Waste Management is spreading $500,000 around the area, $150,000 here in Yamhill County.
I guess they think that we are just local yokels and won't notice the connection between their application to expand the noxious unsorted-anything-can-be-disposed-of-here garbage dump in a flood plain and the greasing of palms.
Waste Management's arrogance and lack of concern for the environment and the surrounding farms and vineyards is crazy making. Three letters to the local paper this week opposed to the dump's 37 acre expansion. One of them mine.
A little too chummy?
Thank you, Jeb Bladine, for your Oct. 31 column, “Awkward time for county partnership.”
And thanks also for the News-Register editorial board’s Nov. 14 opinion piece on the local landfill debate. Reading these two pieces, I couldn’t help but consider the term “quid pro quo” in relationship to the county’s partnership with Waste Management. Waste Management/Riverbend Landfill gives $150,000 each to Yamhill County and its municipalities while soliciting an affirmative vote on Riverbend expansion.
Could the county’s acceptance of $150,000 from an out-of-state corporation with a pending land-use application be more than bad form or a conflict of interest?
Oregon state law says a person (corporation) commits the crime of bribery if the person offers, confers or agrees to confer any pecuniary benefit upon a public servant with the intent to influence the public servant’s vote, opinion, judgment, action, decision or exercise of discretion in an official capacity.
The federal bribery statute provides for a hefty fine and/up to 10 years imprisonment for persons corruptly offering or accepting benefits/dollars with the intent to influence official decision-making. The federal law applies at the local level when the offending official represents an entity that receives at least $10,000 from the federal government.
Partnership? Grant? Donation? Bribe? Quid pro quo? Sure seems like it is worth thought and good discussion at both the city and county levels
http://stopthedumpcoalition.org/TheDump.cshtml
A couple of good youtube videos at this link.
http://leakyland.com/?p=908
Greedy bastards. They should be forced to live in that dump.
ReplyDelete